LadyPredator's favorite crime pages, page 1

Last login: 4 hours agoLadyPredator: Lady Predator is a 56 year old married woman from Lexington, North Carolina, USA.; Likes 376 pages, 10 videos • 37 fans • Received 15 reviews; Member since Jul 15, 2007

Favorites » Her crime pages

Display:
List
• Grid

http://innocentinkiev.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-speical-agent-took-my-daughter-aw…: Jan 6, 11:15pm 0 review crime, corruption, kiev, child-welfare, abuse-of-power, false-arrest
http://innocentinkiev.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-speical-agent-took-my-daughter...

Criminal Injustice: American Eric Volz, Railroaded by Mob Anti-American Mentalit…: Dec 29, 2007 7:32pm 0 review crime
http://www.zimbio.com/Illegal+immigration/articles/275/Criminal+Injustice+Ame...

Injured in the Line of Duty: Dec 29, 2007 10:15am 2 reviews crime, police, pro-life
http://www.tfp.org/TFPForum/TFPCommentary/injured_in_line_duty.htm; At 6:30 am on Saturday, December 22, while most were snug in bed, resting up for Christmas activities, veteran pro-lifer Ed Snell was arriving at Hillcrest Abortion Center, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. He had come with two other activists to persuade women entering the clinic not to abort their pre-born children. The group customarily meets at the clinic and has saved many lives. In fact, they have been so effective, that the clinic erected a 7-foot privacy fence to cut off all communication between the women and the pro-lifers. However, their efforts were scuttled, when the activists began bringing ladders so they could speak over the fence. Mr. Snell, age 69, preferred to stand on a more solid foundation, so he constructed a plywood platform on the roof of his car to elevate him above the fence. "This platform gives him a real steady base and a commanding view," said fellow activist and eyewitness John McTernan. As Ed stood on his platform that morning, a man and woman exited a car in the parking lot and proceeded towards that door of the abortion mill. When Mr. Snell tried to counsel the woman, his words were cut short when the man became furious, jumped the fence and, in the words of Mr. McTernan, "leaped on the vehicle with Ed and catapulted him off of the vehicle and onto the ground." Mr. Snell hit his back and head on the pavement and was knocked unconscious. His medical report outlines the extent of his injuries: "multiple trauma, right subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the tissues that cover the brain), compression fractures of four vertebrae (T3, T4, T5 and T10), right scapula fracture and fracture of the fourth and fifth ribs." Before doctors were able to stop the bleeding in his head, they even feared Mr. Snell would die. When asked on the phone about the vicious attack, the receptionist at Hillcrest Abortion Clinic refused to give a recorded statement and angrily shouted: "He got what he deserved! He earned what he got!" She then hung up the phone. Immediately after the attack, Mr. McTernan ran over to Ed and was frightened to see that he was unconscious and breathing irregularly. He reported the attack to "911" and then shouted to the assailant: "You assaulted him and he is unconscious." Agitated, the man replied: "I did not assault him, I just pushed him," with an aggressiveness that made Mr. McTernan fearful for his own safety. Ed was taken away in an ambulance and three police officers arrived to investigate. They went into the clinic, where the assailant was waiting. After a few moments, the assailant and his companion left the clinic freely, got into their car and drove away. Shocked, Mr. McTernan shouted to the police: "What are you doing? That's him! That's the assailant!" One cop replied: "It is none of your business!" Mr. McTernan: "I am making it my business, Ed Snell is my good friend!" The officer then threatened to arrest Mr. McTernan for interfering with a criminal investigation. Mr. Mcternan replied: "Go ahead and arrest me, I am not afraid. I want to know why the assailant walked away from this scene where an elderly man was left unconscious. We have excellent attorneys and we will sue you if you do not do your job."

Global Politician: Sep 9, 2007 5:45pm 1 review crime, race, iq
http://globalpolitician.com/articleshow.asp?ID=3408&cid=1; This is follow-up to an earlier post - Black Crime and Intelligence - An Intrepid Investigation. No matter how much Leftists and liberals deny it, there are clear differences in racial crime rates in the US. US Hispanics and Blacks have higher crime rates than Whites in the US in the same way that Asians have lower rates. It is neither controversial nor racist to report on this observable fact.

The usual Left explanation for elevated Hispanic and Black crime rates is poverty, lack of opportunity, unemployment, low rates of educational attainment, lack of government investment and poor schools in poor Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. The general rationale behind all of these is said to endemic White structural racism and discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics.

Another argument is that Blacks and Hispanics do not have elevated crime rates - it is only that racist police racially profile Blacks and Hispanics to stop and search them more often, resulting in higher arrest rates, while Whites who are just as criminal are let off the hook.

These appealing arguments are becoming harder and harder to sustain in the face of new evidence and rapidly decreasing White racism in US society, combined with harsh penalties, social, occupational and monetary, against Whites who discriminate against non-Whites, continuing affirmative action programs, judicial mandates for ethnically diverse schools and workforces, etc.

All of this has resulted in a White population whose recent thinking has been molded by anti-racist discourse and who consciously try to overt overt anti-White discrimination and even bigotry most of the time. This is actually a good thing. The judicial system should be fair with regard to suspects and arrestees.

One problem in getting a handle on racial differences in crime rates is that it has been very difficult to find good ethnic breakdowns of US crime rates, mostly because law enforcement agencies usually refuse to count Hispanic offenders at all or in any rational way.

The Color of Crime, a report by the frankly racist New Century Foundation, is nevertheless an excellent document that has managed to dredge up some good figures for Hispanic, American Indian and Hawaiian crime rates in the US.

It has been idiotically bashed all over the Left as "racist". Here is a typical argument, this one from Wikipedia: One New Century Foundation's publication, The Color of Crime, makes various claims about the relationship between crime and race. The publication concludes that black people are more dangerous than white people, just as "young people are more dangerous than old people" and "men are more dangerous than women." It claims that is logical to take precautions around black people.The SPLC has led attacks against the report authored by the execrable Heidi Weiss, leader of an attack force against the fine scholar Kevin MacDonald. The attacks by Tim Wise on ZNet are quite sophisticated and deserve to be rebutted, perhaps in a separate post.

Bottom line is that Wise appears to be disputing what seems obvious to most any non-Leftist with a brain: Black people have a dramatically elevated crime rate, and one is more likely to be victimized by Blacks than by Whites, no matter what one's race is.

Furthermore, Wise's characterizing Jared Taylor as a "White Supremacist" is as problematic as calling 99% of US Jews "Jewish supremacists" based on their Zionism. How about "White Nationalist"? And it is grossly unfair of Wise to call Taylor a Nazi, especially since he renounces anti-Semitism. Wise is an anti-racist activist. I am an anti-racist too, but facts are facts.

Despite the fact that The Century Foundation authored the report, The Color of Crime is excellent, and attacks on the report do not do it service. Those opposed to the report are asked to logically rebut every one of its arguments or hold their tongues. The best figures are towards the middle of the report. Of most interest are the overall Hispanic and Black crime rates.

The Black crime rate is 7.4 times the White rate, the Hispanics 2.9 times the White rate and Indians and Hawaiians are about 2 times the White rate. From another study, Masking the Divide, by the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives, the figures

Exposing Rev. Sutter: The felon who refuses to learn from past mistakes: Aug 26, 2007 4:35am 1 review crime, fraud, fbi, liar, revjimsutter, federal-crime
http://exposingsutter.blogspot.com/2007/08/felon-who-refuses-to-learn-from-pa...; Sutter has a history of making false allegations. Sutter was put on three years probation by a federal court for lying to the FBI about being harassed. Sutter was working for the Cleveland, Ohio BBB as a trade specialist and was investigating Edward Ohlson when he claimed he received a death threat. Sutter reported that he got a one-page letter that read, in part: "Sutter: Testify on [Edward LaMonte Ohlson] and die. Sutter also reported that he was followed by a car licensed to Ohlson's wife, Rose Ellen and gave the FBI the license number of a car that belonged to Rose Ellen Ohlson. There was just one problem with that. It seems that Mrs. Ohlson's car was inoperable for two years. Opps Sutter caught in another lie. Oh and that "death threat" well Sutter sent it to himself!
In fact it also looks like Sutter also lied about the BBB offices being burglarized where he claimed part of Ohlson's file was stolen.
Sutter is doing his best to repeat his illegal behaviors. It seems to me the person who needs the stupid award is Sutter himself.

Hatewatch Hall of Shame: Do We Need the Stupid Awards? (c): Aug 24, 2007 8:05pm 1 review crime, liar, revjimsutter, false-police-reports
http://hatewatchhallofshame.blogspot.com/2007/08/do-we-need-stupid-awards-c.html; It seems three years of probation for doing exactly the same thing (faked a death threat then made a false police report) didn't teach Sutter much of a lesson.
FromThe Plain Dealer Sep 18, 1990
[James M. Sutter] admitted he lied about the car and told [George W. White] he had become "over- zealous" in his pursuit of the investigation of Dr. Edward LaMonte Ohlson. Ohlson is under federal investigation in connection with an advance-fee loan scam involving millions of dollars.
"Assistant U.S. Attorney James V. Moroney said the FBI also is investigating whether Sutter may have sent threatening letters to himself, which he claimed were from Ohlson, and whether a burglary of the BBB offices in May, after which Sutter claimed part of Ohlson's file was stolen, really occurred
A person who has a *history* of filling false police reports and put on probation for lying to FBI should be careful when he threatens to do so again.

from Suter's blog

People, stop being so stupid. Don't you read the articles here about people going to prison?
Ever hear of "America's Dumbest Criminals"? Some people are just so stupid that they not only deserve to get caught, it's actually a service to society to keep them out of the gene pool for a while.
For example, the "former law clerk" who sent me an email, making a "quid pro quo" threat that meets every single element of the felony crime of extortion, and putting it in writing!
Another example, the person who today sent me an email with a not-so-subtle statement that if I exposed his hate mongering, he would tell people that I was a child molester - admitting he had no evidence, no facts, but who cares, right? I think someone will care about his stupidly using his employer's Internet access to make such a threat, and even using it to maintain his ultra-racist site. Especially since the CEO of the company he works for is a minority, holding numerous government contracts. And I know for a fact that the police care, because I've already passed it along.
Another example, I'm told (and it is being investigated by the proper authorities) is that money has changed hands to try to get someone from my past to deny something. (I have the specifics, but I - and others - will wait to see if the actual felony is committed - we should know on Sept 4th.) Unfortunately, you've wasted your money, he ratted you out. He loves controversy, and you handed it to him on a platter. What you think he's going to deny is in my hands, in writing, with his original signature on it, along with the witness signature, and was verified and kept in the custody of the State of Ohio - and has been there for years, since a few days after it was originally signed.

When Tolerance Becomes Criminal | The Brussels Journal: Aug 13, 2007 8:35am 1 review crime
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2283; An unwelcome conclusion for America and Europe emerges. Giving in to aggression might evade a fight initially. However, it will not avoid the risk of ultimate slaughter. Europe's vulnerability derives from its state of mind, which imperils it and its US ally. The preferred approach of the "progressive humanitarians" of both continents will not even restrain a pre-teen gang. The case presented - the danger, the response and the outcome - suggests that a revision of the approach to global politics is called for. It should conform to the rules the bad guys set and abandon the illusions of an ideal world. Iran, Iraq, Korea, but also Russia and China have a message. It counsels that, a reality-corrected change in the assumptions that determine the assessment of antagonists and the means used to respond to them is imperative.

& Hate Crime Laws Need To Be Abolished&-&Pursuing Holiness: Aug 7, 2007 1:35pm 1 review crime, christians, thought-crines
http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/07/28/hate-crime-laws-need-to-be-abolished/; The whole concept of hate crime laws is troubling. Take the Jena Six case for example. There is quite likely selective prosecution going on in LaSalle Parish. Here’s the pertinent criteria, emphasis added: In order to establish a prima facie case of selective prosecution, a defendant must show both “(1) that others similarly situated have not been prosecuted, and (2) that the prosecution is based on an impermissible motive, i.e. discriminatory purpose or intent.” Id. at 475 (emphasis added). See also United States v. Bourgeois, 964 F.2d 935, 938 (9th Cir. 1992). The impermissibly discriminatory purpose or motive must imply “that the decision-maker selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part because or, not merely in spite of, its adverse effects upon an identifiable group. The identifiable group is typically a race, religion, or group of persons exercising a constitutional right.” Gutierrez, 990 F.2d at 476 (citations omitted). Selective prosecution claims are evaluated according to ordinary equal protection standards. Bourgeois, 964 F.2d at 938. Similarly, to establish a prima facie case of vindictive prosecution, a defendant must make a “showing that charges of increased severity were filed because the accused exercised a statutory, procedural, or constitutional right in circumstances that give rise to an appearance of vindictiveness.” United States v. Gallegos-Curiel, 681 F.2d 1164, 1168 (9th Cir. 1982). Why is the motive - determination of which is a soft science at best - a criteria? It should be enough to show statistically that whites are serving less time or not being charged at all for the same crimes when all other factors (such as criminal history, etc.) are equal. Is it more wrong to stop black people from voting than it is to stop white people from voting? How about latinos, or Asians? Fat people, women, religious people? Anyone who prevents a person who is legally entitled to vote should be treated the same way, regardless of the victim of the crime. No group should be “more equal” than others, and as an additional selling point of this concept, I’d like to note that it will make it a good deal easier to prosecute. No more copouts like this: Washington said selective prosecution is very hard to prove, and in order to do so he would have to have to “dig in his head” to determine if Walters was treating black and white people differently. Remove motive from the equation used to determine whether something is a crime and all of a sudden it’s just about facts that are easily proved. Ramp up the penalties and you’ve got a crime prevention tool that will make smart people think twice before committing the crime, or will cause the dumb people who do commit it to be taken out of circulation for a longer period, thus preventing repeats. More than anything, my biggest concern with the concept of “hate crimes” was that at some point it would make the leap from adding penalities to consisting wholly of the crime. And now it has. A man who “desecrated” a Quran has been “arrested on charges of criminal mischief and aggravated harassment, both hate crimes, police said.” He put two Qurans in toilets. By all means, charge him with littering, but that should be the end of it, barring whatever social pressure he might be put under by his community. A similar “crime” occurred when someone wrote rude remarks in a Quaran and tucked in a slice of bacon before throwing it on the steps of a mosque. How are these things materially different than burning a flag, burning a soldier in effigy, or carrying signs around that threaten beheading? Don’t those things exhibit hate too? During the whole Piss Christ controversy, I and most other Christians complained loudly about the fact that Andrew Serrano was disrespectful and obnoxious, and we didn’t want him creating his “art” with our tax dollars. Failing to subsidize something with taxpayer funds is NOT equivalent to blocking him from doing it. It just requires him to either do it for free, or get funding elsewhere. All he had to do was ask his multi

The Jawa Report: Gay Couple Guilty of Child Sex Crimes: Aug 6, 2007 7:35pm 1 review crime
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/188974.php; ((Hartford, Michigan) In June 2007, two former foster parents and same-sex couple, Kurt Alfred Amundson, 42, and Robert George Shafer, 43, were indicted by a federal grand jury for alleged sexual exploitation of a child and possession of child pornography. Both were charged with exploiting a child by producing images of a young boy engaged in sexually explicit conduct. It seems the boy, described as under 13 years old, was a foster child of Amundson and Shafer. In the latest development, both Amundson and Shafer have pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids to producing images of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.Investigators found several images of child pornography, including images of a child befriended by the two men, on computers, cameras, CDs and floppy disks seized from the Hartford men's residence in June 2006, according to a news release. Authorities said the two were licensed as foster-care providers and were in the process of adopting a child for whom they were serving as foster parents. The foster child and the child befriended by the two men alleged that Shafer and Amundson sexually assaulted them, according to the news release.Notably, Amundson was heralded as a homosexual foster parent in a 2003 article, "The Changing Face of the American Family."When asked about his role as a same-sex foster parent he said mentoring children was not satisfying enough for him. "It was helpful, but I wanted to carry the relationship beyond that," he said in the article.Apparently, he did.

Mrs. Edwards Backs Unequal Justice & Family Action Organization: Aug 5, 2007 5:25am 1 review crime, thoguht-police, hate-crimes-law
http://familyactionorganization.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/mrs-edwards-backs-un...; "Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, is diligently protecting his left flank. I reported yesterday on how she promised that her husband's health care plan would cover abortions with taxpayer dollars. She's also recently exhibited the fuzzy thinking behind "hate crimes" laws. Mrs. Edwards said that President Bush (who has signaled he would veto a federal "hate crimes" law) "doesn't seem to recognize the evil in hate crimes," adding, "The right to live without the fear of being murdered for whom we love is not a special right." Of course, all violent crimes are "evil," and "the right to live without the fear of being murdered" is something that should belong-equally-to everyone. Yet equal protection is exactly the principle violated by "hate crime" laws. Edwards alluded to the death earlier this month in Sacramento of a man who allegedly was the target of "anti-gay slurs" before being assaulted. Blame for the murder is being laid upon evangelical Christian Slavic churches in the area solely because assailants reportedly spoke Russian. Those who say that "hate crime" laws won't lead to infringements of religious liberty-but then blame "hate crimes" on peaceful religious opposition to homosexual conduct-are talking out of both sides of their mouth. FRC is running print and radio ads in four states this week and next to raise awareness about the debate going on in the Senate over "hate crimes." Join us in opposing this insidious legislation and call your Senators. Tell them that a "NO" vote on "hate crimes" preserves the American system of equal justice under the law."