LadyPredator's blog, page 5

Last login: 4 hours agoLadyPredator: Lady Predator is a 56 year old married woman from Lexington, North Carolina, USA.; Likes 376 pages, 10 videos • 37 fans • Received 15 reviews; Member since Jul 15, 2007

Favorites » Her Blog

Display:
List
• Grid

Exposing Rev. Sutter: When did the IDF Start Training the Disabled?: Sep 11, 2007 4:33pm 1 review military, fraud, liar, phony, navy-seal
http://exposingsutter.blogspot.com/2007/09/when-did-idf-start-training-disabl...; Over the years since Sutter first made his appearance on the web he had made many claims. I just thought we would do a little stroll down memory lane.

The first of Sutter's greatest hits is this little post he made in August of 1995

I am now a civilian, but I served my country, and received the Navy Cross, (the highest award from the Navy), the Dept of Defense Medal of Valor, and the Purple Heart. So I like to think that I am somewhat qualified to speak to "espirit de corps".

There is just one problem with Sutter's claim he just isn't on the list of persons who received the Navy Cross. Oh well.

In May of 2004 Sutter posted this little gem on Bush_Kicks_A_S_S_on_Terrorism yahoo group (note Sutter has recently gone back into that group and deleted all the posts he made there...guilty conscience maybe?).

Let me tell you something that I do not talk about often. I have 4 Purple Hearts. It took me 26 years of service to earn (yes, earn) them. I was nominated for them by my COs for injuries by hostile forces during combat, resulting in #1 the flesh burned off my legs from the feet to the knees, #2 having a bullet shatter my kneecap, #3 taking 4 bullets in the abdomen, resulting in loss of my gallbladder, part of my liver and intestines and #4 having my elbow shattered by a bullet and minutes later receiving an 8" knife wound in the same arm. Yet I completed my missions in all instances. I have so many prosthetic parts in me that my son calls me RoboPop. I didn't ask for the medals, I didn't ask to be removed from active duty or combat operations, and when I finally retired I put them away in a box with the rest of my medals, (including the Bronze Star, the Combat Medal, the Presidential Unit Citation and the Navy Cross) and left them locked away.
Sutter thinks by sanitizing the yahoo group of his posts he is somehow won't be pinned down for his lies....the only problem is I have a PDF of his post. Not to mention Yahoo will always maintains the original posts in the event of a court order.

Then there is this wonderful post in March of 2006 by Sutter on the Yahoo group Down with Antisemitism (a group that he was kicked off and I'm still a member)
I spent 26 years in the USN CT ops, graduated the Naval War College, trained with the IDF, and spent more time tracking down and neutralizing terrorists than you have probably spent breathing. I have a solid comprehension of the cultures of the Middle East (along with many other cultures), I read and speak English, Arabic, Chinese (Cantonese), French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, Latin and Greek. I have a Bachelor's in Nuclear Physics, a Masters in Modern Warfare, Masters in Theology, a Doctorate of Divinity, Doctorate of Biblical Studies, and Ph.D. in Trauma Psychology. Any other silly questions?

In another post on December 2006 he goes on to claim:

Actually, I'm fluent in several dialects of Arabic. I notice that, as usual, you fail to provide any factual information with which to support your claims. I, on the other hand, provided direct citations from the Qur'an.
Pretty impressive don't you think? He knows eleven languages including several dialects of Arabic and he trained with the IDF. I wonder if they knew he was disabled?

Sutter claims in March of 2006 to know some "very important people" like CIA director James Woolsey

Ironic Surrealism II & Blog Archive & It is not fear that grips me&8230; only…: Sep 11, 2007 5:20am 1 review islam, jihad
http://conservablogs.com/velvethammer/2007/09/10/it-is-not-fear-that-grips-me...; All apologists & dhimmis continue to berate those of us who SPEAK UP! They so need to remove their heads from the sand or their rears, where ever it is they have chosen to shove them. Long enough to face the TRUTH!

They have plans, big plans.
Four Stages of Islamic Treachery: Islamist Tactics Towards Non-Islamic Societies
by Anonymous
01 Sep, 2007
Based On The Evidence Of 1200 Years Of Islamic History
Introduction:
FACT #1:
The goal of Islam is the subjugation of the entire world to Islam through the establishment of a global Islamic rule and the eradication of all non-Islamic populations, cultures, religions, thoughts, knowledge, symbols, traditions and ways of life.
This goal is non-negotiable in fundamental doctrines of Islam and in the eyes of true Muslims.
FACT #2:
Islamists will not stop their assault (open or clandestine) on the non-Muslim world as long as they have not achieved Islamic rule.
FACT #3:
IN ISLAMIC TEACHING, THE END ALWAYS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS: Islamists have no respect for the rules, laws or values of the non-Islamic world, to them only the rules of the Islamic world are legitimate. In their mind, when they destroy the non-Islamic world then the rules will change to Islamic rules, laws and values.
FACT #4:
ISLAMISTS CONSIDER TREATIES WITH NON-MUSLIMS AS NON-BINDING. When in non-Muslim countries they will pretend a social behavior as a cover up to their true intentions of domination over the non Muslim world.
TIP: When it comes to Islamists, ALWAYS LOOK AT WHAT THEY DO, NEVER WHAT THEY SAY: Lying, treachery and deceit are the Islamists’ tactic of choice in their jihad of conquest of the non-Muslim world. This tactic (AL-TAQIYYA, or religious deception, pretending to be friends of the Non-Muslims in order to strengthen themselves against them) is a commonly practiced by Islamists. DECEPTION IS THE KEY TACTIC EMPLOYED BY ISLAMISTS.
FACT #5:
As a rule of thumb to get the truth from any Islamist, simply reverse what they say to a non-Muslim.
FACT #6:
The founder of Islam, MUHAMMAD WAS AN ISLAMIST.
Whether you able to face or ignore this harsh reality is beside the point, you will inevitably face its truth on the day you find yourself within the killing zone of Islamists.
Stages of Islamization

STAGE ONE: INFILTRATION

* First migration wave to target non-Muslim society.

* Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the target non-Muslim society.

* Characterized by professed tolerance of others and their beliefs.

* Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful religion and Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism.

* Images of women and children used to portray Muslims.

* Establishment of mosques as power bases (today globally funded by Gulf countries oil revenue).(Mosques are safe havens for Jihadi recruitment and subversive projects).

* Muslim leaders promote large push for increased Muslim births in target non-Muslim society to increase native Muslim population.

* Misrepresentation of their intentions or aims as a cover up for clandestine operations

The Reverend& Jim Sutter - the Internets Biggest Little Bully: Sep 11, 2007 3:59am 1 review religion, liar, stalker, phony, felon
http://www.phonyrev.com/; Who is James Michael Sutter of Parma, Ohio (and why should anyone care)?

Thanks to the notorious Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Internet's largest commercial URL filtering engines, an otherwise obscure and troubled man named Jim Sutter of Parma, Ohio is having an enormous impact on the free exchange of ideas, particularly as it relates to Islam.

Sutter is using some of the Internet's largest companies to bully others into toeing the theological and political line that he has drawn around the "Religion of Peace," insulating Islam from criticism by haphazardly slinging poisonous allegations of "hate" and "racism" against anyone daring to raise intellectual and academic critique. He is also using these companies to pursue personal vendettas against those who dare slight him.

What makes this particularly heinous is that Jim Sutter is a documented prodigious and pathological liar with a history of exploiting others. Though he masquerades as an "anti-hate" crusader, seamlessly associating religious dissention with child pornography and racism, Sutter is really just a cynical con-artist. He is a convicted criminal, prolific liar and may very well have a diagnosed mental illness... and all this is based on his own words and actions!

This site was created to expose the phony "Reverend" and give hard-working web site editors and operators a research tool to fight back against the problems that this little man and his accomplices are shamelessly inflicting on so many (with the cooperation of Secure Computing, SonicWall, SurfControl and CAIR). If we lose the ability to criticize political and religious totalitarianism, then other liberties will soon follow.

We hope to add to this site as we learn for ourselves more about who the mendacious Jim Sutter really is.

If you have something to add to what we have, please contact us at sutterfacts@yahoo.com!

With the exception of referenced links, images and quoted text, everything

Global Politician: Sep 9, 2007 5:45pm 1 review crime, race, iq
http://globalpolitician.com/articleshow.asp?ID=3408&cid=1; This is follow-up to an earlier post - Black Crime and Intelligence - An Intrepid Investigation. No matter how much Leftists and liberals deny it, there are clear differences in racial crime rates in the US. US Hispanics and Blacks have higher crime rates than Whites in the US in the same way that Asians have lower rates. It is neither controversial nor racist to report on this observable fact.

The usual Left explanation for elevated Hispanic and Black crime rates is poverty, lack of opportunity, unemployment, low rates of educational attainment, lack of government investment and poor schools in poor Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. The general rationale behind all of these is said to endemic White structural racism and discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics.

Another argument is that Blacks and Hispanics do not have elevated crime rates - it is only that racist police racially profile Blacks and Hispanics to stop and search them more often, resulting in higher arrest rates, while Whites who are just as criminal are let off the hook.

These appealing arguments are becoming harder and harder to sustain in the face of new evidence and rapidly decreasing White racism in US society, combined with harsh penalties, social, occupational and monetary, against Whites who discriminate against non-Whites, continuing affirmative action programs, judicial mandates for ethnically diverse schools and workforces, etc.

All of this has resulted in a White population whose recent thinking has been molded by anti-racist discourse and who consciously try to overt overt anti-White discrimination and even bigotry most of the time. This is actually a good thing. The judicial system should be fair with regard to suspects and arrestees.

One problem in getting a handle on racial differences in crime rates is that it has been very difficult to find good ethnic breakdowns of US crime rates, mostly because law enforcement agencies usually refuse to count Hispanic offenders at all or in any rational way.

The Color of Crime, a report by the frankly racist New Century Foundation, is nevertheless an excellent document that has managed to dredge up some good figures for Hispanic, American Indian and Hawaiian crime rates in the US.

It has been idiotically bashed all over the Left as "racist". Here is a typical argument, this one from Wikipedia: One New Century Foundation's publication, The Color of Crime, makes various claims about the relationship between crime and race. The publication concludes that black people are more dangerous than white people, just as "young people are more dangerous than old people" and "men are more dangerous than women." It claims that is logical to take precautions around black people.The SPLC has led attacks against the report authored by the execrable Heidi Weiss, leader of an attack force against the fine scholar Kevin MacDonald. The attacks by Tim Wise on ZNet are quite sophisticated and deserve to be rebutted, perhaps in a separate post.

Bottom line is that Wise appears to be disputing what seems obvious to most any non-Leftist with a brain: Black people have a dramatically elevated crime rate, and one is more likely to be victimized by Blacks than by Whites, no matter what one's race is.

Furthermore, Wise's characterizing Jared Taylor as a "White Supremacist" is as problematic as calling 99% of US Jews "Jewish supremacists" based on their Zionism. How about "White Nationalist"? And it is grossly unfair of Wise to call Taylor a Nazi, especially since he renounces anti-Semitism. Wise is an anti-racist activist. I am an anti-racist too, but facts are facts.

Despite the fact that The Century Foundation authored the report, The Color of Crime is excellent, and attacks on the report do not do it service. Those opposed to the report are asked to logically rebut every one of its arguments or hold their tongues. The best figures are towards the middle of the report. Of most interest are the overall Hispanic and Black crime rates.

The Black crime rate is 7.4 times the White rate, the Hispanics 2.9 times the White rate and Indians and Hawaiians are about 2 times the White rate. From another study, Masking the Divide, by the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives, the figures

Media Silent On Justice Department Fraternization With Terror Defendants | NewsB…: Sep 7, 2007 7:50am 1 review islam, cair, terroists
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/richard-newcomb/2007/09/06/media-silent-justice-...; The crew at Power Line has been doing a superb job of following up the case of the Holy Land Foundation, in which the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) was named as an unidicted co-conspirator. The offical indictment can be found in the previous link. The national media, on the other hand, has been virtually silent, both on the case itself, which has exposed all kinds of illicit relationships, and on the uneasy relationship the United States government has with Muslim organizations such as CAIR, many of whom are linked with the very people whom we are currently fighting.

In today's Power Line, Scott Johnson writes about the fact that while the government has been trying a case in which several Muslim organizations, including CAIR are named as an unidicted co-conspirator, the Justice Department has a booth at one of the Islamic Society of North America (another unindicted co-conspirator)'s conventions! As Mr. Johnson wrote,

On the other hand, the government was fraternizing with one of the unindicted co-conspirators this past weekend in Rosemont, Illinois. The Justice Department sponsored a booth at ISNA's national convention. The Justice Department has declined to say how much it paid for the booth at the convention, but we can infer it paid something. And not just the Justice Department. Janet Ellen Levy usefully summarizes the roster of government departments and agencies attending the convention: "The Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State, the FBI, USAID, the Department of Transportation, and the TSA all had booths at the ISNA [convention]."

See for yourself that &8220;content filtering&8221; is nothing more than priva…: Sep 7, 2007 6:15am 3 reviews liberties, censorship
http://1389blog.com/2007/09/07/see-for-yourself-that-content-filtering-is-not...; This
This just in from Lady Predator:

I’m sure this won’t surprise you but sonicWall has exposingsutter.blogspot.com [exposingsutter.blogspot.com] currently rated as:
Category 1:

Violence/Hate/Racism

So why is Exposing ‘Rev.’ Sutter being blacklisted?
If you can access Exposing ‘Rev.’ Sutter on your computer, go and take a look at it! “Reverend” Jim Sutter is a self-ordained minister who has declared a one-man jihad against every source of antijihadist news and commentary that he can find. We’ve talked about him before.
Among other things, Exposing ‘Rev.’ Sutter charges Sutter with using false complaints to censorware providers as a means of shutting down antijihadist blogs.
See for yourself that Sutter has done the very same thing in an attempt to shut down the blog that reveals his blog censorship activities!
Up to now, SonicWALL and other censorware vendors have been free to impose de facto worldwide censorship on the Internet, with scarcely anyone realizing what’s going on.
They are providing a “back door” that allows our enemies to game the system in order to keep everyone in the dark about jihadist activities.
Up to now, these providers of censorware have been accountable to nobody.
We’re about to change that.
How?
Just for starters, use this form to contact SonicWALL and tell them to reclassify exposingsutter.blogspot.com [exposingsutter.blogspot.com] as “news and media” or as “political advocacy.”

http://blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?blog_post_id=1440: Sep 6, 2007 9:36am 1 review gods-warriors
http://blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?blog_post_id=1440; A day prior to the airing of Christiane Amanpour’s six-hour CNN documentary entitled God’s Warriors, I was one of four clergymen to be a guest on Larry King Live to discuss the issue of fundamentalism in today’s world. The interview on Larry King was pre-recorded in mid-July and none of the participants had seen the six-hour documentary because it was still being edited. Now that I have seen it, I sent the following critique to the producers of God’s Warriors.
1. MORAL EQUIVALENCY - There is no moral equivalency between some 200 Israeli fanatics prone to violence and tens of thousands of Palestinian terrorists whose acts are endorsed by the elected government and a significant portion of the population. The failure of the documentary to clearly make that distinction skews the facts and conveys the false impression allowing people all over the world to conclude that there IS a moral equivalency between the number of Palestinian terrorists and Jewish terrorists - this is a complete distortion. More importantly, the largest terrorist group responsible for much of the unrest in the Middle East, Hamas, got a free pass from CNN in God’s Warriors and is not even mentioned in the documentary’s segment on Islam.
2. JEWISH LOBBY - CNN spends much time describing the strength of the “Jewish Lobby” in Washington. But what do supporters of Israel active on the Hill have to do with a documentary focusing on the power of religion? Indeed, many of those defending Israel on Capital Hill are, in fact, secular Jews. Furthermore, if you are going to talk about powerful lobbies, why not give equal time to the enormous power of the Arab Oil lobby?
3. SECURITY FENCE (Hamas Wall) - The consultants of the documentary make a point of showing the security fence that now separates the Palestinians from the Israelis. Palestinians interviewed explain the hardships they face and call the fence an “apartheid” wall. Nowhere is there a mention of the wide consensus of support for the security fence amongst all Israelis, left and right, including Israel’s Supreme Court, which has sanctioned the fence because, without it, the suicide bombings would continue unabated, something NO society can tolerate. Indeed, the terrorist groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad are the real architects and designers of that fence.
4. FIGHTING TERRORISM - God’s Warrior’s makes mention of the fact that the few Jewish terrorists described in the film were all arrested by the Israeli government and sent to jail for their crimes. Yet, they ignore the fact that Palestinian officials have never convicted Palestinian terrorists. Had they done so, there would be no need for a security fence.
5. SIX DAY WAR - The documentary spends a lot of time on the Six Day War and emphasizes how Israel decided to attack the Old City during the War, which changed the status quo forever. But God’s Warriors fails to explain how or why the Six Day War started. It hides from its audience the fact that Egypt blocked the Straits of Tiran (an international waterway), an act of war under international law, denying all shipping to Israel and that the Arab States, including Jordan, which controlled the Old City, brought their armies to the border. Had they not taken those actions, the Six Day War would have been averted. By ignoring all that and instead focusing on Israel’s attack on the Old City, God’s Warriors guides its audience to the conclusion that the purpose of the War was Israel’s intention to grab the Old City of Jerusalem.

Reform Judaism Magazine - Pipeline to Peril: Sep 6, 2007 8:30am 2 reviews islam, politics, europe
http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=1113; Pipeline to Peril
How Europe's surrender in the face of the 1973 oil embargo turned the continent against Israel and set off a wave of violence against Jews.

by Richard L. Rubenstein

On the European continent, Jews are under siege. The EU has turned aggressively against Israel, and the post-Holocaust taboo on anti-Semitic speech and incitement has been broken, opening the way for a plethora of anti-Jewish statements, cartoons, and caricatures.

What lies at the root of this shift? During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries unleashed the oil weapon, embargoing critical oil exports to the United States and Western Europe as a strategy for compelling Israel to withdraw unconditionally from all territories occupied in the 1967 war.

The US rejected Arab demands, but the European Community (EC, later EU), more dependent on Arab oil than America, decided on a policy of outright appeasement. This led to a series of quasi-official meetings between European and Arab officials and experts that culminated in a meeting at the ministerial level in Paris on July 31, 1974. There, an agreement was reached to initiate the Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD), an ongoing series of closed, high-level meetings between senior officials of the two sides which would enable the EC and the Arab League to formulate a new understanding on economic, cultural, and diplomatic issues. An important EAD objective was the eventual replacement of the US by the French-led European Community as the dominant influence in the Middle East. Over time, the EAD would institute a number of long-term policy agreements that guaranteed the Europeans both an uninterrupted oil supply and lucrative export contracts with oil-rich Arab states. In return, the Europeans would facilitate international recognition of the PLO at a time when its charter called for Israel's destruction, and enable Arab religious, cultural, and intellectual institutions to achieve unprecedented influence in Europe.

The Arabs also pressured the EC to relax its immigration rules and permit a massive influx of Muslims into Europe. From its inception, every EAD meeting passed resolutions in support of Muslim immigration to Europe.

Banning Jihad Watch - HUMAN EVENTS: Sep 6, 2007 5:39am 1 review censorship, jihad-watch, web-filtering
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21439; Banning Jihad Watch

by Robert Spencer

I began getting the emails several days ago: Jihad Watch readers telling me that they had been accustomed to reading the site at work, but now their employer had blocked access to the Jihad Watch site on company computers. Many reported that the ban on Jihad Watch was explained with the assertion that Jihad Watch contained “hate speech.” This was true even in some Federal Government offices. Jihad Watch was also blocked, readers informed me, on the computers of the State of Connecticut; the City of Chicago; Bank of America; Fidelity Investments; Site Coach; GE IT; JPMorgan Chase; Defense Finance and Accounting Services; Johnson Controls, Inc. IT; Boeing; Tenet Hospitals in North Carolina; Provisio; the Sabre Group TSG; Wachovia bank; and others.

This is an attempt to silence us, as an email from a federal employee made abundantly clear:

I wanted to drop a line about the inability to access JihadWatch at work. I work for the Fed Gov. Three weeks ago, Memri was blocked. Two weeks ago HotAir, which I used to look at on my lunch break for your updates, was blocked. As of Friday, June 29th, JihadWatch was blocked. I can however, visit CAIR, read anything about Islam, and even get the Arab news. The censors I deal with are from the Dallas area. It is very easy to see that this censor is not operating according to the proper rules of access. They are operating by their political beliefs (or hopes.) It is unfortunate that these people block the very information that we need in these times....

Obviously this is a decision made in some central location, with impact within all these different places -- but I am not certain of the source of it. I have contacted a web filter service to which several of these organizations apparently subscribe and which therefore may have initiated this general ban, but have not heard back yet. In any case, the matter of most concern in this is the likelihood that the decision was made to ban Jihad Watch was political. If it were merely a matter of filtering out controversial material, sites that treat some of the same material from a different perspective -- particularly pro-jihad sites -- would also have been banned. But they evidently have not been.

Jihad Watch is dedicated to the defense of human rights for all against those who would impose Islamic law, with its institutionalized discrimination against women and religious minorities. There is no “hatred” in this, except when we report the words of hatred and supremacism of the Islamic jihadists. We are trying to raise awareness of the nature, extent, and goals of the global jihad, which threatens everyone who loves and cherishes freedom and the equality of rights of all people before the law.

However, to tar such initiatives as “hatred” is a tried and true tactic of the Left. Intellectually bankrupt, they can’t answer us, so they try to shut us up and discredit us. Leftists, as well as apologists for Islamic jihad terrorism, label their opponents “hatemongers” and “bigots,” hoping thereby to make people of good will turn away from their message. The politicized nature of Internet censorship should surprise no one.